Let’s just say that the Grand Jury had the 2001 information but they did not have to name the source.
The judge allowed the Grand Jury to hand over the 2001 information to prosecutors. And, in turn, they used it as evidence. The judge allowed the 2001 information to be used as evidence without checking the validity or source of the information.
The defense did not require that the evidence be checked for validity or sources.
No one questioned the information. It was assumed that the information concerned Sandusky, but in reality, it did not.
The information was used in court by the prosecuting attorneys.
(The prosecution knew the information was Falsified -Tainted- Forged.)
Zealots.
I believe that the 2001 mix up on information occurred after the office was broken into at the campus and then the house was broken into, where the logbook entry validated the information on file in Coach Paterno’s office.
The information was used but did not become official until the trial when the statements were made concerning the sounds heard from the locker room, by McQueary that were coming from the shower room. McQueary denied hearing the sounds.
The point is that the prosecution knew about the sounds. And used the information as evidence. The problem with that, is, where did they get the information that no one knew? (Information that was only found in the logbook of Paterno, in his house. )
Don Robbins Blog 